Source Code Review

24 - Source Code Review

Source Code
Review

A black-box test only sees what is exposed. A source code review finds the flaws an attacker would need months and a lot of luck to reach from the outside, in a fraction of the time. We read your code the way an attacker reads it, by hand and with tooling, and show you exactly where the logic, authentication and data-handling flaws live.

  • Manual secure code review of your most critical components
  • SAST tooling with expert triage, never a raw scanner dump
  • Authentication, authorisation and session-handling logic review
  • Injection, deserialisation, SSRF and business-logic analysis
  • Secrets, dependency and supply-chain review
  • Remediation guidance ranked by real exploitability, not theory
Discuss This Service
Languages
JavaScript / TypeScript · Python · Java · C# / .NET · Go · PHP · Ruby · and more
Methodology
Manual review + SAST · OWASP ASVS · threat-led, focused on what is reachable
Outputs
Findings with code references · exploitability rating · developer-ready fixes
OWASP ASVS OWASP Top 10 CWE Top 25 SANS 25

Common Questions

How do you keep our source code secure during a review?

Under NDA, handled onshore only, on encrypted systems, with all copies securely destroyed at the end of the engagement. The same data-sovereignty commitment as every RTCS service applies to your code.

Do you review manually or with tools?

Both. SAST tooling for breadth, manual review for the authentication, authorisation, and business-logic flaws that tools can't reason about. You get expert triage - never a raw scanner dump.

Do you need our entire codebase?

No. A scoped review of the security-critical paths - auth, session handling, payment flows, data access - beats a shallow pass over everything. We agree the scope before we start.

See Every Service.

View All Services Get in Touch